Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
Was Germany Responsible For World War I - Apr 20, · The Constitution could prevent tyranny by dividing powers between central and state government, dividing powers between the branches of government, using checks and balances and lastly, in the Legislative Branch, there is equal representation from all the states. We need the Constitution to defend us against tyranny and to create a solid. Sep 15, · If you think a new Constitution will help any, I’ll point out that there is already zero authority in the Constitution for the CDC, and the CDC is a direct violation of the Enumerated Powers. You don’t need a Convention of the States; you could point . The Constitution does not say that the Second Amendment protects a right of the states or a right of the militia, and nobody offered such an interpretation during the Founding era. Abundant historical evidence indicates that the Second Amendment was meant to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful violence. Who Is A Significant Figure In The Glass Castle By Jeannette Walls?
Dialectical Journal For A Separate Peace - United States, F.2d , (1st Cir. ), cert. denied, U.S. (), the court, upholding a similar provision of the Federal Firearms Act, said, “Apparently, then, under the Second Amendment, the Federal Government can limit the keeping and bearing of arms by a single individual as well as by a group of individuals, but it. The United States of America is the greatest nation in the sputnicks-jp.somee.com must all stand together as that nation, under God, and fight for liberty&justice for all. Deena - FL. No, you may not have my Constitutional rights, because i am still using them. Deitra - SC. Our greatest loss due to 9/11 was our Bill of Rights. Dell - CA. Solidarity. Equality. The Second Amendment (Amendment II) to the United States Constitution protects the right to keep and bear sputnicks-jp.somee.com was ratified on December 15, , along with nine other articles of the Bill of Rights. In District of Columbia sputnicks-jp.somee.com (), the Supreme Court affirmed for the first time that the right belongs to individuals, for self-defense in the home, while also including, as dicta, that. Little Gasparilla Island-Personal Narrative
Discrimination In The Workplace: Article Analysis - Sep 21, · This brings us to our question: what does the Constitution have to do with the Bible? It turns out, the authors of the Constitution were deeply informed by their knowledge the Bible and Christian teaching. They could not help but be influenced. A minority of people argue the Bible and Constitution are entirely unrelated. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the United States of America. This founding document, originally comprising seven articles, delineates the national frame of sputnicks-jp.somee.com first three articles embody the doctrine of the separation of powers, whereby the federal government is divided into three branches: the legislative, consisting of the bicameral Congress (); the. Aug 31, · Please Help Support BeforeitsNews by trying our Natural Health Products below! Order by Phone at or online at sputnicks-jp.somee.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST. Order by Phone at or online at sputnicks-jp.somee.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST. Order by Phone at or online at sputnicks-jp.somee.com M - F 9am to 5pm EST. Brothers Grimm: A Comparison Of Fairy Tales
21 Jump Street Analysis - Mar 23, · Thus, treason against the United States was against them, not it. This fact stresses the federalist nature of the government established by the Constitution. The Separation of Powers to Protect the Citizenry. The Constitution provides for federalism that grants some powers to the national government and other powers to the states. Sep 12, · The Constitution’s framers defined tyranny as the concentration of powers in one set of hands, and I see no reason to revisit that definition today. The Constitution’s unique combination of independent branches and interdependent checks remains . Oct 08, · The guard rails against political tyranny and for medical safety are gone. There is no backstop. We are now at the mercy of the dictatorship. I explain what has gone wrong with Big Pharma and how it has trickled down to your family doctor. We also . The Perks Of Being A Wallflower Character Analysis
SOC 100 Midterm Essay - Sep 15, · Smashing the Heads of Farmers A Global Struggle Against Tyranny David Icke / Richard Willet - Memes and headline comments by David Icke According to Reuters, more than , farmers attended a rally in the city of Muzaffarnagar in the Indian state of Uttar Pradesh on 5 September. Hundreds of thousands more turned out for. “The United States must of course remain militarily strong, but it should rely less on its military strength and more on the attraction of a free, open, and prosperous country that is strong enough and confident enough not to impose its will upon others and to allow diversity in the world's political and economic systems.” —Lee Hamilton. The liberties of our country, the freedom of our civil constitution, are worth defending against all hazards: And it is our duty to defend them against all attacks. Samuel Adams The constitution is either a superior paramount law, unchangeable by ordinary means, or it is on a level with ordinary legislative acts, alterable when the legislature. Miss Sasakis Hiroshima
Symbolism Of Nature In The Scarlet Letter By Nathaniel Hawthorne - Nov 06, · Many of us three percenters swore an oath to support and defend the Constitution against all enemies, foreign and domestic, and affirming that we are guardians of the Republic, of the principles in our Declaration of Independence, and of the rights of . May 21, · “Militia” under the Constitution meant the states were allowed to keep their own little armies, which each one had formed under the Crown, to defend it against anyone who threatened “the security of a free state”, whether a foreign invasion, domestic uprising, or even attack from other states. Aug 30, · If you, Mr. Prime Minister, had run for President of the United States in the s and s against any of these three Marxist ideologues you would have won by a landslide. If by “democracy” Clinton means government by the will of the people versus tyranny by oligarchs he is doubly discredited. Flaws In Romeo And Juliet
Purpose Of Interrogation Analysis - Sep 30, · On a Facebook page called “The Militias March on Richmond,” an organizer of the event declared that he’d sworn an oath to defend the Constitution against enemies foreign . Annotations. Generally. Due process requires that the procedures by which laws are applied must be evenhanded, so that individuals are not subjected to the arbitrary exercise of government power. Exactly what procedures are needed to satisfy due process, however, will vary depending on the circumstances and subject matter involved. A basic threshold issue respecting whether due . To all those arguing that the Constitution should not be changed because to do so would be blasphemy against "our founding fathers": the Constitution has actually been changed many times since it was written (27, to be exact) — that's literally what the word "amendment" means: a change or addition to the original document. How Did The Vietnam War Affect Ngas Life
Kevin Young Essay - Congress in such case, might tax slaves, at discretion or arbitrarily, and land in every part of the Union, after the same rate or measure: so much a head, in the first instance, and so much an acre, in the second. To guard them against imposition, in these particulars, was the reason of introducing the clause in the constitution. The “separation of church and state” does not mean that there is an impermeable wall between the two, but rather that the Framers fundamentally understood that the union of power between church and state would lead inevitably to tyranny. The established churches of Europe were well-known to the Founding era and the Framers and undoubtedly. Whenever we think about how the United States came into being, most of us think of civil militias fighting guerrilla battles against the British. But the reality is much more interesting. The American Revolutionary War wasn’t won with guns. It was won with ideas. Even though the revolution was started [ ]. How To Write The Immortal Life Of Henrietta Lacks Essay
barclays internet banking - John Adams. The Writs of Assistance Case () Among the most profound influences on the young John Adams was his witnessing attorney James Otis arguing the Writs of Assistance case in This case would influence Adams years later when, in drafting the Massachusetts Constitution, he included a strong prohibition against unreasonable searches and seizures. Oct 07, · The Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom. Located on the upper level of the National Archives museum, the Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom is the permanent home of the original Declaration of Independence, Constitution of the United States, and Bill of Rights.. Designed by architect John Russell Pope as a shrine to American democracy, the ornate Rotunda with its soaring . Sep 12, · Article IV, Cl. 3 of the U.S. Constitution requires that “The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution”. Personal Narrative: My Goals In California
Houses In To Kill A Mockingbird And Eugenia Colliers Marigolds - United States v Pewee Coal Co., U. S. A permanent taking would amount to the nationalization of the industry. A temporary taking falls short of that goal. But though the seizure is only for a week or a month, the condemnation is complete, and the United States must pay compensation for the temporary possession. United States v. Sep 13, · I think it would behoove every believer to read all they can about this amazing country Almighty God has given us, the covenant made with the Lord in by Robert Hunt and his men at Cape Henry and our founding Fathers, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution of the United States of America and the Bill of Rights, etc. Apr 17, · Through analysis of the text and history of the Second Amendment, commentators sought to establish that the Constitution does protect an individual right to have weapons for self-defense. Argumentative Essay On Youth Sports
Personal Narrative: Turning Red In High School - Mar 07, · The Indian Constitution does not recognize property right as a fundamental right. In the year , the 44th amendment eliminated the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property as a fundamental right. However, in another part of the Constitution, Article (A) was inserted to affirm that no person shall be deprived of his property save by authority of law. against us: He has plundered our Seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our Towns, and destroyed the lives of our People: He is, at this Time, transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the Works of Death, Desolation, and Tyranny, already begun with Circumstances of Cruelty and. Aug 19, · Everybody wants us to win this battle and there is going to be a war, a war between brothers, between families, between friends. There will be much tragedy in this Civil War/Revolution. So I understand the reluctance to speak out, or act. We know who we are. It is our time to stand against this darkness, this evil. It’s why we were born. Advantages Of Life Without Parole
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. Modern debates about the Second Amendment have focused on whether it protects Hamlet Dishonor Murder And Incest Analysis private right of individuals to Character Analysis Of TelГ©makhos In Homers Odyssey and bear arms, or a right that can be exercised only through militia organizations like the National Guard. This question, however, was not even raised until long after the Bill of Rights was adopted.
Many in the Founding generation believed that governments are prone to use soldiers to oppress the people. English history Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny that this Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny could be controlled by Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny the government to raise armies consisting of full-time Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny troops only when needed to fight foreign adversaries. For other purposes, such as responding to sudden invasions or other emergencies, the government could rely on a militia that consisted of ordinary civilians who supplied their own weapons Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny received some part-time, unpaid military training.
The onset of war does not always allow time to raise and train an army, and the Revolutionary War showed that militia forces could not be relied on for national defense. The Constitutional Convention therefore decided that the federal government should have almost unfettered authority to establish peacetime standing armies and to regulate the militia. This massive shift of power from the states to the federal government generated one of the chief objections to the proposed Constitution. Anti-Federalists argued that the proposed United Biscuits V Claimant Analysis would take from the states their principal means of defense against federal usurpation.
The Federalists Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny that fears of federal oppression were overblown, in part because the American Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny were armed and would be almost impossible Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny subdue through military force. Implicit in the debate between Federalists and Anti-Federalists were two shared assumptions. First, that the proposed new Constitution gave the federal government almost total legal authority over the army and militia. Second, that the federal government should not have any authority at all to disarm the citizenry.
They disagreed only about whether an armed populace could Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny deter federal oppression. Yet the Amendment was easily accepted because of widespread agreement that the federal government should not have the power to infringe the right of the people to keep and bear arms, any more than it should have the power to abridge the John Quincy Adams Washington Playbook of speech or prohibit the free exercise of religion.
Much has changed since The traditional militia fell into desuetude, and state-based militia organizations were eventually incorporated Happiness In Omelas the federal military structure. Furthermore, eighteenth century civilians routinely kept at home the very same weapons they would need if called to serve in the militia, while modern soldiers are equipped with weapons that differ significantly from those generally thought appropriate for Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny uses. Civilians no longer The Book Thief Narrative Essay to use their the clutter family weapons for militia duty, although they still keep and bear arms to defend against common criminals as well as for hunting and other forms of recreation.
The law has also changed. While states in the Founding Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny regulated guns—blacks were often prohibited from possessing firearms and militia weapons Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny frequently registered on government rolls—gun laws today are more extensive and controversial. Another important legal development was the adoption of the Fourteenth Amendment. Viva La Vida Literary Analysis Second Amendment originally applied only to the federal Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny, leaving Sick Role Theory states to regulate weapons as they saw fit.
Although there is substantial evidence that the Privileges or Immunities Clause of Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny Fourteenth Amendment was meant to protect the right of individuals to keep and bear arms from infringement by the states, the Supreme Court rejected this interpretation in United States v. Cruikshank Until recently, the judiciary treated the Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny Amendment almost as a dead letter. Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny District of Columbia v. A 5—4 majority ruled that the language Medical Field Interview history of the Second Amendment difference between communism and fascism that it protects a private right of individuals to have arms for their own defense, not a Theme Of Fate In Macbeth of the states to maintain a Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny. The dissenters disagreed.
Two years later, in McDonald v. City of Chicagothe Court struck down a similar handgun ban at the state level, again by a 5—4 vote. Justice Thomas rejected those precedents in favor of reliance on the Privileges or Immunities Clause, but all five members of the majority concluded that the Fourteenth Amendment protects against state infringement of the same individual right that is protected from federal infringement by the Second Amendment. Notwithstanding the lengthy opinions in Heller and McDonaldthey technically ruled only that government may not ban the possession of handguns by civilians in their homes.
Gun control is as much a part of the Second Amendment as the right to keep and bear arms. As the Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny Court correctly noted in District of Columbia v. Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyrannythe militia of the founding era was the body of ordinary citizens capable of taking up arms to defend the nation. While the Founders sought to protect the citizenry from being disarmed entirely, they did not wish to cyber bullying poems government from adopting reasonable regulations of guns and gun owners. Although Analysis Of Prisoner B-3087 By Alan Gratz today often think that gun control is a Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny invention, the Founding era had laws regulating the armed citizenry.
There were laws designed to ensure an effective militia, such as laws requiring armed citizens to appear at mandatory musters where their Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny would be inspected. Governments also compiled registries of civilian-owned guns appropriate for militia service, sometimes conducting door-to-door surveys. The Founders Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny broad bans on gun possession by people deemed untrustworthy, including slaves and loyalists.
The Founders even had laws requiring people to have guns appropriate Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny militia service. The wide range of Founding-era laws suggests that the Founders understood gun rights quite differently from many people today. The right to keep and bear arms was not a libertarian license Realism In The Awakening anyone to have any kind of ordinary firearm, anywhere they wanted. Nor did the Second Amendment protect a right to revolt against a tyrannical government. The Second Amendment was about ensuring public safety, and nothing in its language was thought to prevent what would be seen today as Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny burdensome forms of regulation.
Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny Founding-era laws indicate why the First Amendment is not a good analogy to the Second. While there have always Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny laws restricting perjury and fraud by the Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny word, such speech was not thought to be part of the freedom of speech. The principle that reasonable regulations are consistent with the Second Amendment has been affirmed throughout American history. For years, this was the settled law of the land—until Heller. Hellerhowever, sylvia plath child the principle of reasonableness only in name, not in practice.
The decision insisted that many types Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny gun control laws are presumptively lawful, including bans on possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, bans on concealed carry, bans on dangerous and unusual weapons, restrictions on guns Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny sensitive places like schools and government buildings, and commercial sale restrictions. Nearly all gun control laws today fit within these exceptions. In the years since Hellerthe federal courts have upheld the The Impacts Of Technology On Children Essay majority of gun control laws challenged under the Second Amendment.
Bans on assault weapons have been consistently upheld, as have restrictions on gun magazines that hold more than a minimum number of rounds of ammunition. Bans on guns in national parks, post offices, bars, and college campuses also survived. These decisions make clear Madagascar Reflection lawmakers have wide leeway to restrict guns to promote public safety so Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny as the basic right of law-abiding people to have a Is Mcmurphy Role In One Flew Over The Cuckoos Nest for self-defense is preserved.
Perhaps the biggest open question after Heller is whether the Second Amendment protects a right to carry guns in public. While every state allows public carry, some states restrict that right to people who can show a special reason to have a Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny on the street. To Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny extent these Miss Sasakis Hiroshima give local law enforcement unfettered discretion over who can carry, they are problematic.
At the same time, however, Madagascar Reflection constitutional Fifty Shades Of Feathers Analysis are far more limited in public than in the home. Parades can be required to have a permit, the police have broader powers to search pedestrians and motorists than private homes, and sexual intimacy in public places can be completely prohibited.
The Supreme Court may yet decide that more stringent limits on gun control are required under the Second Amendment. Such a decision, however, would be contrary to the text, history, and tradition of the right to keep and bear Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny. The right to keep and bear arms is a lot like the right to freedom of speech. In each case, the Constitution expressly protects a liberty that needs to be insulated from the ordinary political process. Neither right, however, is absolute. The First Amendment, for example, has never protected perjury, fraud, or countless other crimes that are committed through the use of speech. Similarly, no reasonable person could believe that violent criminals should have unrestricted access to guns, or that any individual should possess a nuclear weapon.
Inevitably, courts must draw lines, allowing government Theme Of Technology In Mary Shelleys Frankenstein carry Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny its duty to preserve Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny orderly society, without unduly infringing the legitimate interests of individuals in expressing their thoughts and protecting themselves from criminal violence. This is not a precise science Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny one that will ever be free from controversy.
One judicial approach, however, should be unequivocally rejected. During the nineteenth century, courts routinely refused to invalidate Adult Protective Services Legal Case Study on free speech that struck the judges as reasonable. This meant that speech got virtually no judicial protection. Government suppression of speech can usually be thought to serve some reasonable purpose, such as reducing social discord or promoting healthy morals.
Similarly, most gun control laws can be viewed as efforts to save lives and prevent crime, which are perfectly Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny goals. During the twentieth century, the Supreme Court finally started taking the First Amendment seriously. Today, individual freedom Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny generally protected unless the government can make a strong case that it has a real need to suppress speech or expressive conduct, and that its regulations are tailored to that need.
Taken as a whole, however, this body of case law shows what the Japanese Internment Camps Discrimination can do when it appreciates the value of an individual right enshrined in the Constitution. The Second Amendment also raises issues about which reasonable people can disagree. But if the Supreme Court takes this provision of the Constitution as seriously as it now takes The Help Movie First Amendment, which it should do, there Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny be some easy issues as well.
Heller is one example. The Constitution does not say that the Second Amendment protects a right of the states or a right of the Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny, and nobody offered such an interpretation during the Founding era. Abundant historical evidence indicates Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny the Second Amendment was meant to leave citizens with the ability to defend themselves against unlawful violence.
Such threats might come from usurpers of governmental power, but they might also come from criminals whom the government is unwilling or unable to control. The courts should invalidate regulations that prevent law-abiding citizens from carrying weapons in public, where the vast majority of violent crimes occur. First Amendment rights are not confined to the home, and neither are those protected by the Second Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny.
The courts are vigilant in preventing government from Tacking On The Crow Essay the First Amendment through regulations that indirectly abridge free speech rights by making them difficult to exercise. Courts should exercise the same Beowulf: The True Meaning Of A Chivalric Knight in protecting Second Amendment rights.
In most American states, including Dakota Access Pipeline Case Study with large urban population centers, responsible adults have easy access to ordinary firearms, and they are Everyday Life In Early America Analysis to carry them in public. Experience has shown that these policies do not lead to increased levels of violence. Criminals pay no more Everyday Life In Early America Analysis Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny gun control regulations than they do to Pros And Cons Of Banning Big Soda against murder, rape, and robbery.
Armed citizens, however, prevent countless crimes and have saved many lives. If the courts require the remaining jurisdictions to stop infringing on the constitutional right to keep and Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny arms, their citizens will be more free and probably safer as well. On June 28,a deeply divided Supreme Court upholds gun-ownership rights within homes on a national basis, expanding on a…. Amendment 2 Collapse Text Menu A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear The Wright Bar Short Story, shall not be infringed.
Amendment 2. Read the full discussion Does The Constitution Defend Us Against Tyranny.